![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Please click images to view full size version |
Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting
Held on Wednesday 9 September 2009
In the Meeting Point, High Bickington at 7.30pm
Present:
Myc Riggulsford (Chairman), Chris Brown, David Brown, Stella Burrows, Roger Keen, Mike Leatham, Stan Maskell, Peter Tucker.
In attendance:
David Venner – Community Property Trust; 3 members of the public; Mrs Di Carter, Clerk
Matters raised by the public – concerns were raised on the following highways matters:
The Clerk was asked to follow these matters up with the relevant authorities.
The Chairman invited Mike Leatham to outline the current position. Mike Leatham said he was pleased that the July meeting was well attended by members of the public when the possible sale of the Hall Site was presented. The Parish Council is keen to ensure that the views of the public are taken into account on issues such as this. It is generally felt that the site is not large enough to accommodate a village hall and car park. One option would be to sell the land back to Pearce as covered in the covenant, monies raised to go towards the provision of a village hall on the Little Bickington Farm site. In the debate at the July Parish Council Meeting members of the public had no major objection to the hall site being sold but strong feelings were widely expressed that the copse area be retained.
A meeting was subsequently arranged with Pearce Construction, attended by Chairman, Mike Leatham, Chris Brown and Stan Maskell. Minutes of this meeting were circulated to all Councillors and a copy of a letter from Pearce confirming details of the meeting.
The possibility of co-development of the site was discussed. This would give the Parish Council more input into the development of the site, but would mean no monies would be paid by Pearce until the development of the site was completed and properties sold. Councillors present at the meeting recommended that this option should not be taken further.
Before property prices fell Pearce had offered £130,000 for the site, including the copse, with plans to build 4 houses. The current offer for the land, minus the copse, is £100,000 with a proposal to build 3 houses. The Parish Council would put in covenants protecting the hedge bank and copse. The Parish Council may sell the copse to a third party but the Pearce covenants restricting its use and any building on it would remain in place. The Parish Council will retain any money gained from selling the copse.
It was felt that £100,000 was a fair offer for the reduced area bearing in mind the fall in land prices and compared favourably per house with the earlier offer. It was understood that the monies would be payable to the Parish Council on receipt of planning permission. The site may not be developed for some time. A discussion took place on the offer and it was agreed that further clarification should be sought from Pearce as follows:
It was further agreed that the copse area be measured and surveyed in case of future sale.The Chairman proposed that the Parish Council takes forward the offer of £100,000 from Pearce, subject to the above points being clarified, to allow for planning permission on the Hall Site to be applied for. A final decision will be made on receipt of a formal contract from Pearce.
Decision:Councillors present (7) agreed unanimously to the Chairman’s proposal. It was noted that the monies raised from the sale of the Hall Site can only be used for capital works and the monies would be ring-fenced for a specific capital purpose to be decided later.
The Chairman raised the matter of the strip of land sold to the Council by Mrs Harpum:
Decision:Councillors present (7) agreed to proposal 2) and the Chairman will arrange to speak to Mrs Harpum on behalf of the Council.
In view of this decision the Chairman withdrew his earlier proposal.
The Chairman asked for clarification of the figures shown in the presentation to the Parish Council at their July meeting under the heading “Funding Appraisal”. Funding from Devon County Council of £250,000 was not accompanied by an explanation. Mike Leatham explained that the £250,000 was seed core funding and was set out in the legal contract between High Bickington Community Property Trust and Devon County Council. This money had not been sought by the Community Property Trust but had been put in place by DCC. It is, therefore, revenue and not income. The Chairman requested that this funding be clarified on a revised spreadsheet to provide a full picture of funding and expenditure for the project. Mike Leatham has provided this since the meeting*:
*The building of the scheme for a total of £11,699,000 has been budgeted so that a scheme surplus is generated of £1 million. This amount, if achieved, is to be shared by the High Bickington Community property Trust and Devon County Council on a 1:3 basis. The first £250,000.00 (25%) will be retained by HBCPT as a ‘dowry’ so that the long-term viability of the Community Property Trust is fully assured. The remaining £750,000.00 (75% - or a lesser amount if the scheme fails to generate the full £1 million budgeted surplus) will be paid to Devon County Council as payment for the Freehold Housing Land that will have been transferred to HBCPT in the early stages of the Contract. These are both contractual sums set out in a Legal Contract between High Bickington Community Property Trust and Devon County Council.
The Chairman reported that Atherington Parish Council had sent him a copy of their June minutes but had informed him that it is unlikely further copies will be forthcoming as Atherington Councillors felt the minutes could be viewed in the local Post Office.
The recent village Fete raised a total sum of approximately £2,600 which will be donated to village causes. Councillors wished to send their congratulations to all involved in the organisation of the Fete for a very successful event.
The Chairman reported that Torridge Standards Committee will shortly be circulating a leaflet to all Parish Councils on the question of dispensations. It is possible to apply for dispensations re declarations of interest on behalf of individual Councillors for a specific matter, to allow them to speak when it is felt to be in the best interests of transparency for them to do so, or when more than half of councillors are prevented from speaking due to personal or prejudicial interests.
There being no further business the meeting closed at 9:34pm.